- Printable Version (PDF)
- Agency Profile
- Agency Operating
- General Education
- E-12 Education Shifts
- Enrollment Options Transportation
- Abatement Revenue
- Consolidation Transition
- Nonpublic Pupil
- Nonpublic Transportation
- Compensatory Pilot Grants
- Special Provisions for Select Districts
- Charter School Lease Aid
- Digital Learning
- Integration Revenue
- Interdistrict Desegregation Transportation
- Success for the Future
- Indian Teacher Preparation
- Tribal Contract Schools
- Assessments
- APIB
- Collaborative Urban Educator
- Student Organizations
- EPAS
- Early Childhood Literacy
- Elementary and Secondary Education Act
- Other Federal Programs
- Special Education - Regular
- Special Education - Excess Cost
- Children with Disabilities
- Home-Based Services
- Court Placed Special Education Revenue
- Out of State Tuition
- Other Federal Special Education Programs
- Health and Safety Revenue
- Debt Service Equalization
- Alternative Facilities Aid
- Deferred Maintenance
- Telecommunications Access
- School Lunch
- School Breakfast
- Summer Food Replacement
- Commodities
- Child and Adult Food Care
- Kindergarten Milk
- Basic Support
- Multicounty Multitype
- Electronic Library Minnesota
- Regional Library Telecommunications
- Early Childhood Family Education
- School Readiness
- Kindergarten Readiness Assessment
- Access to Quality Early Learning
- Health and Developmental Screening
- Head Start
- Infant and Toddlers Part C
- Preschool Special Education
- Community Education
- Adults with Disabilities
- Hearing Impaired Adults
- School Age Care
- Adult Basic Education Narrative
- GED Tests
Statewide Outcome(s):
Alternative Facilities Revenue supports the following statewide outcome(s).
Minnesotans have the education and skills needed to achieve their goals.
Context:
School districts, students, and taxpayers are better served through healthy, well-maintained facilities, and through extension of facility life. This program allows large school districts to complete deferred maintenance, health and safety, and disabled accessibility projects that cannot be completed with other available funds and small school districts to address large scale health and safety projects.
Strategies:
Alternative facilities revenue allows large districts to complete projects that will maintain and extend the life of facilities. The following districts are currently eligible and participating in the 1A (large district) program. 1A districts must meet one of the following criteria to be eligible:
· have at least 1.85 million square feet of space and an average building age of at least 15 years; or
· have at least 1.5 million square feet of building space and average building age of at least 35 years.
Anoka-Hennepin           Duluth                          Mounds View               Roseville                      Bloomington
Elk River                      North St. Paul              South Washington        Burnsville                     Hopkins
Osseo                         St. Cloud                            Chaska                        Lakeville                      Robbinsdale
St. Paul                               Eden Prairie                 Minneapolis                 Rochester                    Stillwater
White Bear Lake           Minnetonka                  Rosemount                  Edina
To receive alternative bonding revenue, 1A districts must submit a ten-year facility plan to the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) for approval. The plan must describe eligible projects and the district’s timetable for undertaking them. Eligible projects are for deferred maintenance, health and safety, and disabled accessibility. Once MDE approval is obtained, the district must decide if it will:
· issue bonds to finance improvements and retire them over time with a debt service levy;
· make an annual general fund (pay-as-you go) levy to fund projects on an annual basis; or
· some combination of these two options.
Alternative facilities revenue provides limited access to all other school districts only for an approved health and safety project of $500,000 or more per building. This limited expansion of the program, effective for FY 2005 and later, allows all other school districts (1B districts) to spread the cost of approved large health and safety projects over a span of years so as not to unduly increase property tax burdens.
Voter approval is not required to access this revenue. This program is funded by a combination of state aid and local property tax levies. School district debt service levies under this program qualify for Tier 1 debt service equalization. Annual school district general fund (pay-as-you-go) levies under this program qualify for health and safety aid.
Seven of the 25 large 1A districts also qualify for alternative facilities aid. Aid is based on the lesser of the current annual debt service cost for alternative facility or the certified debt service levy for the program for taxes payable in 1997 if a district issued bonds. For districts certifying an annual levy, the amount is limited to the lesser of the district’s annual levy or one-sixth of the levy certified for taxes payable in 1998.
Results:
MDE does not collect data on the condition of school district facilities. The intention of facility funding is to provide a revenue stream for facility maintenance. MDE can only report on how much state aid and district property tax is being utilized by districts.
|
Performance Measures |
Previous |
Current |
Trend |
|
Debt Revenue, Large (1A) districts* |
$47.8 mil |
$96,1 mil |
Increasing |
|
General Fund Levy, Large (1A) districts* |
$36.0 mil |
$60.6 mil |
Increasing |
|
Debt Revenue, All Other Districts (1B)* |
$4.4 mil |
$24.5 mil |
Increasing |
|
General Fund Levy, All Other Districts (1B)* |
$0.0 mil |
$1.7 mil |
Increasing |
|
Average Health and Safety and Alternative Facility Revenue per adjusted pupil unit in the 25 eligible districts.** |
$428 |
$426 |
Stable |
|
Average Health and Safety and Alternative Facility Revenue per adjusted pupil unit in ineligible districts.** |
$199 |
$226 |
Increasing |
|
Percent of revenue accessed by ineligible district compared to 25 eligible districts.** |
46.40% |
53.10% |
Increasing |
Performance Measures Notes:
*The previous data is from FY 2005 and current data is from FY 2011.
** The previous data is from FY 2010 and current data is from FY 2013.