Historical Analysis of Developmental Disabilities Legislation
- 1970 P.L. 91-517
- 1975 P.L. 94-103
- 1978 P.L. 95-602
- 1981 P.L. 97-35 Omnibus Reconciliation Act
- 1984 P.L. 98-527
- 1987 P.L. 100-146
- 1990 P.L. 101-496
- 1994 P.L. 103-230
- 1996 P.L. 104-183
- 2000 P.L. 106-402
| LEGISLATION: | P.L. 98-527 (1984) |
| A. DEFINITION OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY: | No change. |
| B. PROGRAM: |
|
| C. PRIME CONCEPTS: | New language added to purpose (which provides direction and outcomes desired by Congress): "…to achieve their maximum potential through increased independence, productivity, and integration into the community…" New definitions: a. Independence — extent to which people exert control and choice over their own lives; b. Productivity — engagement in income-producing work; c. Integration — using common community resources, participating in community activities with persons who do not have disabilities, and residing in homes or homelike settings in the community. d. Other definitions included: services, service activities, priority services, employment-related activities, supported employment, and satellite UAF center. |
| D. ALLOTMENT FORMULA: | Adjustment allowed only on annual basis. States must be notified not less than six months before the beginning of the fiscal year. |
| E. USE OF FUNDS: | A state's federal share allowed to be calculated in the aggregate—75 percent federal in non-poverty, 90 percent in poverty. (This meant that states may vary the level of match required of subgrantees depending on the purpose of the project.) The 35% funds for administration may be used for service activities, planning, coordination, administration, and advocacy. |
| F. SERVICES: | Priority services (up to three allowed by 1987): alternative community living arrangements, employment related activities (new), child development, and case management. Note: nonvocational social-developmental services dropped from the list. |
| G. ADMINISTRATION: | Restricts the percentage of funds permitted to fund the state administering agency to provide services. Council membership expanded to include representatives of: a) the principle state agencies, including vocational rehabilitation, Education of the Handicapped, Title XIX (Medicaid); c) each UAF or Satellite; d) Protection and Advocacy Systems; e) local agencies; and non-governmental agencies and private non-profit groups. One Council member may fulfill two or more requirements for membership. |
| H. STATE PLAN: | Required after FY 1986, the selection of employment-related activities as a mandatory priority in each state. |
| I. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: | No change. |
| J. EVALUATION: | |
| K. BILL OF RIGHTS: | No change. |
| L. HABILITATION PLANS: | No change. |
| M. PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY: | P&As given access to individual records if a complaint has been received; a person does not have a legal guardian; or the state or designee of the state is the legal guardian. Process established for agency redesignation. |
| N. REVIEW PLANS: | No change. |
| O. EMPLOYEE PROTECTION: | No change. |
| P. SPECIAL REPORTS: |
|
| Q. PROFESSIONAL ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION SYSTEMS: | No change. |
| R. UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED PROGRAMS |
Authorized UAF feasibility studies for establishing new UAFs: a) to establish a UAF or satellite in an area not served; b) to perform a needs assessment; and c) to study ways UAFs can assist in establishing one or more satellite centers. [Note: University of Minnesota, established as a satellite program under Iowa UAP sponsorship.] |
| S. OTHER: | |
| T. ASSURANCES: |