September 08, 2014 - 1. The Additional Notice Plan is APPROVED.
2. The Dual Notice is APPROVED, contingent upon the following adjustments to the telephone and facsimile numbers listed in the “Notice of Hearing” section of the Notice:
(a) Telephone (651) 361-7881
(b) FAX (651) 539-0030
September 03, 2014 - The Board has established that it has the statutory authority to adopt the proposed rules, that it complied with applicable procedural requirements and that the proposed rules are necessary and reasonable.
August 28, 2014 - 1. Whether the preponderance of the evidence supports the October 25, 2013, finding of serious and recurring maltreatment of children in her care, resulting in disqualification from contact with persons served in licensed programs?
2. If so, whether the Respondent has demonstrated that she does not pose a risk of harm to children in her child care so as to set aside the disqualification of the Respondent?
3. Whether the Department has shown reasonable cause that the license holder failed to comply with applicable laws and rules for the Department to take action against Respondent’s child care license?
4. If so, has the Respondent shown by a preponderance of the evidence that she is in full compliance with the statutes and rules governing her child care so as to rescind the revocation of the license?
5. If not, does the record provide a sufficient basis for taking adverse action against the Respondent’s child care license?
6. If so, what sanction is appropriate based on the nature, chronicity, and severity of the violations, or required under appropriate statute?
August 27, 2014 - 1. The rules were adopted in compliance with the procedural requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 14, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1400.
2. According to Minn. Stat. § 176.136, subd. 1a, the Board has the statutory authority to adopt these proposed rules using the exempt rulemaking process.
3. The adopted rules are APPROVED.
August 25, 2014 - 1. That Respondent’s Motion to Strike the portion of Complainants’ Summary Disposition Memorandum that exceeds 25 pages is DENIED.
2. That the Complainants’ Motion for Summary Disposition is DENIED.
3. That the Respondent’s Motion for Summary Disposition is GRANTED.
August 25, 2014 - The Administrative Law Judge concludes that the Applicant has satisfied the applicable legal requirements and recommends that the Commission grant the Applicant a route permit for the Project, along the Proposed Route described below, and subject to the conditions discussed below.
August 19, 2014 - 1. The Office has the statutory authority to adopt the rules.
2. The rules were adopted in compliance with the procedural requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 14, and Minnesota Rules, Chapter 1400.
3. The record demonstrates the rules are needed and reasonable.
4. The rules are APPROVED.