The performance measures that Dayton would choose for himself relate to jobs and the economy. He would be the first to say that the current 5.9 percent state unemployment rate is too high, and that it understates the distress of underemployed and discouraged would-be workers.
But Minnesota is exhibiting more economic vitality than is much of the rest of the country, and Dayton can take credit for some of the sparks. The $500 million bonding bill that he insisted be part of last summer's budget deal is a tonic to depressed construction industries. His speed-up of the business permitting process is hastening job creation. His decision to enroll the state's lowest-income childless adults in Medicaid shored up health care employment, especially in rural Minnesota.
More significant are the contributions that state government can make to prosperity over the long term, through smart investments in human capital, financed with fair and competitive tax policies.
Dayton deserves applause on the former front and a nudge on the latter. His vetoes blocked the worst of GOP-backed spending cuts for higher education and human services. His administration is making health dollars stretch farther; a switch to competitive bidding for state health contracts is projected to save nearly $250 million by mid-2013. He landed $45 million in federal funds for a rating system deemed crucial for improving preschool education in child care settings.
Tax policy was this newspaper's biggest disagreement with candidate Dayton in 2010. (Our endorsement went to the Independence Party's Tom Horner.) Dayton's call for higher income taxes on the wealthy struck us as simplistic and anticompetitive.
A more nuanced tax policy message has recently come from the Dayton camp. Revenue Commissioner Myron Frans is soliciting public input for an overhaul of the state tax code that could involve broadening the sales tax base and eliminating income tax loopholes. That's a more promising path, chosen by a more nimble and risk-tolerant chief executive than his critics expected.
"Confounding critics" would be a fitting theme for this governor's first year. Though labeled "erratic" by partisan opponents, he has been steady and focused. Accused of being unfriendly to business, he quickly signed onto environmental permitting and teacher licensure changes long sought by the business lobby. Faulted as remote while a U.S. senator (2000-2006), he has been an active, visible governor, impressing audiences with his willingness to listen as well as speak.